JJC, that is interesting. I wonder how you blended the two
applications being that he run in different languages.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Steve, that sounds great! I know many c-Bridge ops that support
hotspot connections would like some of the new features and speed of
Python3. For what I do it does not matter that much except that
hblink is going on life support.
On 1/24/2019 13:23, Steve N4IRS wrote:
Mike and I have discussed it somewhat. Keeping the ability to
bridge IPSC <-> HB is still important.
On 1/24/2019 1:05 PM, Jon K1IMD
Steve & Group,
With Cort's announcement of EOL of hblink will there be any
migration of HB_Bridge with hblink3?
The reason I ask is that I (and many others I believe) we have a
number of ISPC_Bridge<->HB_Bridge to connect mmdvm
repeaters to c-Bridges. In my case I am not doing any TGID
translations or remapping presently and I assume that hblink
should run fine for the foreseeable future. However, it would
be nice to take advantage of some of the features in hblink3 at
some point in the future directly verses perhaps daisy chaining