Re: Do we need more subgroups. #poll
Mike KB8JNM
I would understand that it is a number of subgroups, but I don't think as many as you state because you are counting some twice.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
DMR <> YSF would include YSF <> DMR But in any case, a BRIDGING subgroup might be in order as a start till more is sorted out.
On 3/13/2019 1:44 PM, Jim Gifford  K9AGR wrote:
A subgroup per bridge pair could quickly get out of hand. For N modes, you'd end up with (N * (N1)) / 2 subgroups.

