Re: Do we need more subgroups. #poll
Mike, I respectfully understand your position, but not many even understand the difference.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Could we settle on a Bridge Subgroup and at least four of the most popular bridge groups (whatever they are)
and a 3rd group of everything else.
To monitor or sort for help reading all of it in 2/3 groups is not much help for anyone involved.
They need to be separated by the search/need pattern. I understand that will change over time.
On 3/13/2019 2:35 PM, Mike Zingman - N4IRR wrote:
A different way to slice this is to have a small set of subgroups that talk about format bridges