|
Re: traffic from XLX breaks the bridge
XLX log:
I: 2019-12-01 18:45:51.187 MMDVM_Bridge:
I: 2019-12-01 18:45:51.187 Portions Copyright (C) 2018 DVSwitch, INAD.
I: 2019-12-01 18:45:51.187 Hacks by Mike N4IRR and Steve N4IRS
I: 2019-12-01
XLX log:
I: 2019-12-01 18:45:51.187 MMDVM_Bridge:
I: 2019-12-01 18:45:51.187 Portions Copyright (C) 2018 DVSwitch, INAD.
I: 2019-12-01 18:45:51.187 Hacks by Mike N4IRR and Steve N4IRS
I: 2019-12-01
|
By
Patrick Perdue
·
#5542
·
|
|
Re: traffic from XLX breaks the bridge
OK, good. Now do the same thing with MB_BM running. Post both logs.
OK, good. Now do the same thing with MB_BM running. Post both logs.
|
By
Steve N4IRS
·
#5541
·
|
|
Re: traffic from XLX breaks the bridge
I have now updated to v2.3.2. How does this interlink without talkgroup conversion work in this version as opposed to older ones?
I have now updated to v2.3.2. How does this interlink without talkgroup conversion work in this version as opposed to older ones?
|
By
Patrick Perdue
·
#5540
·
|
|
Re: traffic from XLX breaks the bridge
I: 2019-12-01 18:38:59.097 MMDVM_Bridge:
I: 2019-12-01 18:38:59.097 Portions Copyright (C) 2018 DVSwitch, INAD.
I: 2019-12-01 18:38:59.097 Hacks by Mike N4IRR and Steve N4IRS
I:
I: 2019-12-01 18:38:59.097 MMDVM_Bridge:
I: 2019-12-01 18:38:59.097 Portions Copyright (C) 2018 DVSwitch, INAD.
I: 2019-12-01 18:38:59.097 Hacks by Mike N4IRR and Steve N4IRS
I:
|
By
Patrick Perdue
·
#5539
·
|
|
Re: traffic from XLX breaks the bridge
In you MMDVM_Bridge.ini for the XLX connection:
DisplayLevel=1
FileLevel=2
Clear the log, start MB_XLX ONLY, send some traffic through the reflector, stop MB, post complete log.
In you MMDVM_Bridge.ini for the XLX connection:
DisplayLevel=1
FileLevel=2
Clear the log, start MB_XLX ONLY, send some traffic through the reflector, stop MB, post complete log.
|
By
Steve N4IRS
·
#5538
·
|
|
Re: traffic from XLX breaks the bridge
Here's that version. First transmission is from Brandmeister, second is from the reflector. I transmitted from Brandmeister again but it isn't in the log.
I: 2019-12-01 18:22:43.822
Here's that version. First transmission is from Brandmeister, second is from the reflector. I transmitted from Brandmeister again but it isn't in the log.
I: 2019-12-01 18:22:43.822
|
By
Patrick Perdue
·
#5537
·
|
|
Re: traffic from XLX breaks the bridge
I don't link to BM here, but the new v2.3.2 YSF embedded XLXD offer's more linking options now with YSF connect direct to XLX & DMR to BM in a much more simple format,
without the issue
I don't link to BM here, but the new v2.3.2 YSF embedded XLXD offer's more linking options now with YSF connect direct to XLX & DMR to BM in a much more simple format,
without the issue
|
By
Adrian Fewster <vk4tux@...>
·
#5536
·
|
|
Re: traffic from XLX breaks the bridge
Set FileLevel=2, clear the log and retest.
Set FileLevel=2, clear the log and retest.
|
By
Steve N4IRS
·
#5535
·
|
|
Re: traffic from XLX breaks the bridge
Here is the full log from the XLX MMDVM_Bridge. There was only one transmission sent from the reflector itself other than MMDVM_Bridge quick keying to connect to 4001.
I:
Here is the full log from the XLX MMDVM_Bridge. There was only one transmission sent from the reflector itself other than MMDVM_Bridge quick keying to connect to 4001.
I:
|
By
Patrick Perdue
·
#5534
·
|
|
Re: traffic from XLX breaks the bridge
In you MMDVM_Bridge.ini for the XLX connection:
DisplayLevel=1
FileLevel=1
Send some traffic through the reflector and post the log output. I suggest you clear the log, start MB,
In you MMDVM_Bridge.ini for the XLX connection:
DisplayLevel=1
FileLevel=1
Send some traffic through the reflector and post the log output. I suggest you clear the log, start MB,
|
By
Steve N4IRS
·
#5533
·
|
|
traffic from XLX breaks the bridge
Hi:
I've been trying to set this up all day, and am stumped by the following situation.
Now that I've sorted my XLX problems (I hope,) I have two instances of MMDVM_Bridge connecting a BM talkgroup
Hi:
I've been trying to set this up all day, and am stumped by the following situation.
Now that I've sorted my XLX problems (I hope,) I have two instances of MMDVM_Bridge connecting a BM talkgroup
|
By
Patrick Perdue
·
#5532
·
|
|
Re: Linking dmrlink and HBlink3
#dmrlink
#hblink
You should only be defining one system on the dmrlink.cfg used with IPSC_Bridge.py. It’s intended to be a one-off. There is no call forwarding between systems. If you intend to use multiple IPSC
You should only be defining one system on the dmrlink.cfg used with IPSC_Bridge.py. It’s intended to be a one-off. There is no call forwarding between systems. If you intend to use multiple IPSC
|
By
Cort N0MJS <n0mjs@...>
·
#5531
·
|
|
Re: Linking dmrlink and HBlink3
#dmrlink
#hblink
Doh. Yep, I bridge.py now. I am starting small to get at least one bridge working and will replicate from there once success is achieved. I am building the Moto stanzas in dmrlink.cfg as follows and
Doh. Yep, I bridge.py now. I am starting small to get at least one bridge working and will replicate from there once success is achieved. I am building the Moto stanzas in dmrlink.cfg as follows and
|
By
ai6bx
·
#5530
·
|
|
Re: Brandmeister to XLX
Yes I am still there on D-Star & DMR, and tested both ways fine re transcoder. However when the MB traffic from BM TG commences,
the transcoder fails and the BM traffic is just heard on
Yes I am still there on D-Star & DMR, and tested both ways fine re transcoder. However when the MB traffic from BM TG commences,
the transcoder fails and the BM traffic is just heard on
|
By
Adrian Fewster <vk4tux@...>
·
#5529
·
|
|
Re: Brandmeister to XLX
Logged on via MB and my DMR repeater all seams ok. Passing traffic. Cannot test Dstar.
Get Outlook for Android
Logged on via MB and my DMR repeater all seams ok. Passing traffic. Cannot test Dstar.
Get Outlook for Android
|
By
Ernie Gm7kbk
·
#5528
·
|
|
Re: Brandmeister to XLX
Ernie, they may be symptoms associated at the time, but the red thumb, is just a failure of the database sync with the authenticated hash file that the server then verifies the Ip, and
Ernie, they may be symptoms associated at the time, but the red thumb, is just a failure of the database sync with the authenticated hash file that the server then verifies the Ip, and
|
By
Adrian Fewster <vk4tux@...>
·
#5527
·
|
|
Re: Linking dmrlink and HBlink3
#dmrlink
#hblink
bridge.py is part of hblink3 – the Python 3 version of HBlink.
HB_Bridge.py and hb_bridge_all.py are completely different programs with completely different uses.
“Address already in use”
bridge.py is part of hblink3 – the Python 3 version of HBlink.
HB_Bridge.py and hb_bridge_all.py are completely different programs with completely different uses.
“Address already in use”
|
By
Cort N0MJS <n0mjs@...>
·
#5526
·
|
|
Re: Brandmeister to XLX
If I see a red thumb on my server it means there is something wrong. Failed to start ambeserver. Ports not set. XLX not started properly. Taking a hard drive from another machine. XLX looks for the
If I see a red thumb on my server it means there is something wrong. Failed to start ambeserver. Ports not set. XLX not started properly. Taking a hard drive from another machine. XLX looks for the
|
By
Ernie Gm7kbk
·
#5525
·
|
|
Re: Brandmeister to XLX
It's looking now like a bad packet knocking out the transcoder. Need to setup logging to test further.
DMR & D-Star connections seem solid, and ports ok.
It's looking now like a bad packet knocking out the transcoder. Need to setup logging to test further.
DMR & D-Star connections seem solid, and ports ok.
|
By
Adrian Fewster <vk4tux@...>
·
#5524
·
|
|
Re: Brandmeister to XLX
Check
http://64.94.238.196/status/places/BlockedUsers.htm
for any blocks once you test again and it fails.
Check
http://64.94.238.196/status/places/BlockedUsers.htm
for any blocks once you test again and it fails.
|
By
Adrian Fewster <vk4tux@...>
·
#5523
·
|