|
Re: looking at my options
Steve,
They are definitely up
root@ip-172-31-19-69:/opt/310749/P25Reflector# netstat -unap | grep -e "P25Gateway" -e "P25Reflector"
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:42010 0.0.0.0:*
Steve,
They are definitely up
root@ip-172-31-19-69:/opt/310749/P25Reflector# netstat -unap | grep -e "P25Gateway" -e "P25Reflector"
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:42010 0.0.0.0:*
|
By
Mike AE4ML
·
#3411
·
|
|
Re: looking at my options
Mike I run 3 P25 reflectors on dvswitch.org:
[General]
Daemon=0
[Id Lookup]
Name=/var/lib/mmdvm/DMRIds.dat
Time=24
[Log]
# Logging levels,
Mike I run 3 P25 reflectors on dvswitch.org:
[General]
Daemon=0
[Id Lookup]
Name=/var/lib/mmdvm/DMRIds.dat
Time=24
[Log]
# Logging levels,
|
By
Steve N4IRS
·
#3410
·
|
|
Re: looking at my options
Steve,
I started building on the centralized reflector(s)
The first reflector was no problem. Its up and working.
The second reflector nothing can connect to it. I see in the logs of the repeater
Steve,
I started building on the centralized reflector(s)
The first reflector was no problem. Its up and working.
The second reflector nothing can connect to it. I see in the logs of the repeater
|
By
Mike AE4ML
·
#3409
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Not a problem, Lito.
Good idea on the firewall ports, but by default Debian 9 comes with the firewall wide open. I think this is the same story for Raspbian. Since there's many firewalls (iptables,
Not a problem, Lito.
Good idea on the firewall ports, but by default Debian 9 comes with the firewall wide open. I think this is the same story for Raspbian. Since there's many firewalls (iptables,
|
By
Steve KC1AWV
·
#3408
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Ok.. It looks like I got it running. At first I was wondering if I needed to set the firewall ports for these two ports as soon as I added these to the rules.v4 file, data started flowing.
Now, I need
Ok.. It looks like I got it running. At first I was wondering if I needed to set the firewall ports for these two ports as soon as I added these to the rules.v4 file, data started flowing.
Now, I need
|
By
Lito - WI6Y
·
#3407
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Lito et al.:
Here's a ruff draft of the BM to XLX via MMDVM_Bridge (DVSwitch distribution) on Debian 9.
Assumptions made that you're using a Debian 9 box, and installed the DVSwitch apps via the
Lito et al.:
Here's a ruff draft of the BM to XLX via MMDVM_Bridge (DVSwitch distribution) on Debian 9.
Assumptions made that you're using a Debian 9 box, and installed the DVSwitch apps via the
|
By
Steve KC1AWV
·
#3406
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
No, I misread the message. it looks right.
No, I misread the message. it looks right.
|
By
Steve N4IRS
·
#3405
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Hi Steve (IRS),
I was under the impression that:
bridge1 tx 35100<--> bridge2 rx
bridge1 rx35103<--> bridge2 tx
Is this what I am doing wrong?
Thank you
Lito
Hi Steve (IRS),
I was under the impression that:
bridge1 tx 35100<--> bridge2 rx
bridge1 rx35103<--> bridge2 tx
Is this what I am doing wrong?
Thank you
Lito
|
By
Lito - WI6Y
·
#3404
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
You can NOT use the same port pairs for both instances of MMDVM_Bridge.
You can NOT use the same port pairs for both instances of MMDVM_Bridge.
|
By
Steve N4IRS
·
#3403
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Thank you Steve,
I found a configuration error and turned off the YSF in the BM side.
When I do netstat this is what I get
root@localhost:/etc# netstat -lntu
Active Internet connections (only
Thank you Steve,
I found a configuration error and turned off the YSF in the BM side.
When I do netstat this is what I get
root@localhost:/etc# netstat -lntu
Active Internet connections (only
|
By
Lito - WI6Y
·
#3402
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Lito,
I just realized that what you say is the BM side looks like it's actually running the XLX side. Check the logs:
I: 2019-02-27 17:26:30.656 Description: "MMBr2XLX"
So... it looks like what
Lito,
I just realized that what you say is the BM side looks like it's actually running the XLX side. Check the logs:
I: 2019-02-27 17:26:30.656 Description: "MMBr2XLX"
So... it looks like what
|
By
Steve KC1AWV
·
#3401
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Lito,
I don't see anything from MMDVM_Bridge on the XLX side.
The MMDVM_Bridge on the BM side is using ports that are transposed from the posted DVSwitch.ini, check the log:
M: 2019-02-27
Lito,
I don't see anything from MMDVM_Bridge on the XLX side.
The MMDVM_Bridge on the BM side is using ports that are transposed from the posted DVSwitch.ini, check the log:
M: 2019-02-27
|
By
Steve KC1AWV
·
#3400
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Hi Nick,
Have you tried this?
[XLX Network]
Enabled=1
File=XLXHosts.txt
Port=62030
Password=passw0rd
ReloadTime=60
# Local=3351
Slot=2
TG=6
Base=64000
Startup=933
Relink=10
Debug=0
#Allow user
Hi Nick,
Have you tried this?
[XLX Network]
Enabled=1
File=XLXHosts.txt
Port=62030
Password=passw0rd
ReloadTime=60
# Local=3351
Slot=2
TG=6
Base=64000
Startup=933
Relink=10
Debug=0
#Allow user
|
By
Lito - WI6Y
·
#3398
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Hi all,
Here is my DMRGateway.ini to connect to XLX
Mine is connected to XLX933-E
I've tried 2 MMDVM_Bridge instances to connected a XLX to IPSC2 but it don't work.
IPSC2fr3 <--> MMDVM_Bridge 1 <-->
Hi all,
Here is my DMRGateway.ini to connect to XLX
Mine is connected to XLX933-E
I've tried 2 MMDVM_Bridge instances to connected a XLX to IPSC2 but it don't work.
IPSC2fr3 <--> MMDVM_Bridge 1 <-->
|
By
Nicolas Larvor <f4fkd@...>
·
#3397
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
When I get a chance, I sure will. We are in a middle of a SAP implementation so like you, the day job takes precedence😃.
73,
Lito
When I get a chance, I sure will. We are in a middle of a SAP implementation so like you, the day job takes precedence😃.
73,
Lito
|
By
Lito - WI6Y
·
#3396
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Yes Lito, you have the right idea.
If you run the two programs for the XLX side in the foreground, can you copy and paste the output to me? Maybe I can diagnose what's going on before I complete the
Yes Lito, you have the right idea.
If you run the two programs for the XLX side in the foreground, can you copy and paste the output to me? Maybe I can diagnose what's going on before I complete the
|
By
Steve KC1AWV
·
#3395
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Yesterday, by testing with the XLX067 system, I was able to make reception and transmission work with the DMRplus system.
I passed it through the HBlink system. I think it is also possible for the BM
Yesterday, by testing with the XLX067 system, I was able to make reception and transmission work with the DMRplus system.
I passed it through the HBlink system. I think it is also possible for the BM
|
By
Valentino
·
#3394
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Hi Steve (AWV),
First of all there's a lot of Steves here 😄, jk.
So in reference to what you said, would it look like this:
BM TG xxxx <--> MMDVM Bridge BM <-----> MMDVM Bridge XLX <------>
Hi Steve (AWV),
First of all there's a lot of Steves here 😄, jk.
So in reference to what you said, would it look like this:
BM TG xxxx <--> MMDVM Bridge BM <-----> MMDVM Bridge XLX <------>
|
By
Lito - WI6Y
·
#3393
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Ben,
Well yeah, for an interlink. If you don't need an interlink, 2 instances of MMDVM_Bridge and a DMRGateway will work, which is the instruction set I'm putting together.
If you need AMBE vocoding
Ben,
Well yeah, for an interlink. If you don't need an interlink, 2 instances of MMDVM_Bridge and a DMRGateway will work, which is the instruction set I'm putting together.
If you need AMBE vocoding
|
By
Steve KC1AWV
·
#3392
·
|
|
Re: BrandMeister to XLX
Ooo how does that work? Someone on their end has to approve the connection I thought? --
Ben Fogt
N5AMD
Ooo how does that work? Someone on their end has to approve the connection I thought? --
Ben Fogt
N5AMD
|
By
Ben Fogt
·
#3391
·
|