A new poll has been created: We have just crossed 200 registered users! Though, most people are just lurking. I'm very happy with GroupsIO but I wonder if it's time to breakup the message traffic into

#poll

Hi Steve, Really with the quantity of traffic we get through at the moment, I think its better to just see it all in the one group? 73, Peter

#poll

Hi Steve and all, I only lurk, as I am not currently in need of assistance and have no experience to contribute. However, I find reading the variety of topics that come through to be informative, and

#poll

We use Groups.io subtopics in nw-digital-radio.groups.io to separate interest groups (eg. AMBE, UDRC, Compass, ...) and it works quite well.

#poll

A new poll has been created: With over 600 users and quite a few subgroups already I'm not sure is we need more segregation of the topics. The initial list of subgroups works until we get into bridgin

#poll

I would like to thank the total of 16 (out of 600) people that responded to the poll. Steve

#poll

Interesting. I never saw the poll. But then most of the DVSwitch messages I see, I only glance over. I don’t use anything but “Mobile”. Now that I have actually looked at the subgroups, it might be us

#poll

So, A very interesting thing has shown up in the voting so far. Though the majority of votes want separate subgroups, some of the people that answer questions voted to leave things the way they are. S

#poll

somehow i missed it too i must have marked everything read when i got a backlog of messages from being away a few days...... I'm very much in favor of the subgroups, it makes things easier to ready wh

#poll

Hi Steve, I too missed the post about the poll. I typically do not use the web portal and maybe that is why. In any event, groups for each "mode" would be helpful. For instance, most of the traffic on

#poll

Jon, Maybe someone in the HB subgroup can take it on, Mike and I are up to our ears right now. Steve

#poll

So the question becomes, I want to build a DMR <-> D-Star bridge, what subgroup do I use? DMR? D-Star? Steve

#poll

I would suggest A separate bridge subgroup for the pair <>

#poll

I would agree with Mike (JNM).

#poll

A subgroup per bridge pair could quickly get out of hand. For N modes, you'd end up with (N * (N-1)) / 2 subgroups. For 5 modes, that's 10 bridging subgroups. For 7 modes, you're up to 21 bridging sub

#poll

I would understand that it is a number of subgroups, but I don't think as many as you state because you are counting some twice. DMR <> YSF would include YSF <> DMR But in any case, a BRIDGING subgrou

#poll

Did I miss any? D-Star <-> DMR D-Star <-> YSF D-Star <-> NXDN D-Star <-> P25 DMR <-> YSF DMR <-> NXDN DMR <-> P25 YSF <-> NXDN YSF <-> P25 NXDN <-> P25 This is without ASL

#poll

The (N - 1) accounted for the fact that bridges work in 2 directions. Otherwise it would be N*N / 2.

#poll

without making it "complicated". The destination would be the topic name. I think we can assume DMR is the core mode. I don't think I've seen a bridge system someone has worked on that hasn't inluded

#poll

I think that has it as far as I can see except as you mentioned ASL

#poll