Date
1 - 20 of 75
BrandMeister to XLX
Yes, it's possible to do this. It would take 2 instances of
MMDVM_Bridge. One connected to BM and the second connected to XLX.
Each MMDVM_Bridge would need to be in a separate directory so that
each MMDVM_Bridge would have a local copy of DVSwitch.ini and
MMDVM_Bridge.ini
As always, buld from the outside in. Connect the first MMDVM_Bridge to BM. Make sure it's logging in properly and receiving data from BM. The connect the second MMDVM_Bridge to XLX. Make sure it's logging in and receiving data.
Point the DMR TX and RX port at the XLX RX and TX ports. Traffic should pass from XLX to BM. Run each program in the foreground so you can watch waht is happening.
73, Steve N4IRS
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
As always, buld from the outside in. Connect the first MMDVM_Bridge to BM. Make sure it's logging in properly and receiving data from BM. The connect the second MMDVM_Bridge to XLX. Make sure it's logging in and receiving data.
Point the DMR TX and RX port at the XLX RX and TX ports. Traffic should pass from XLX to BM. Run each program in the foreground so you can watch waht is happening.
73, Steve N4IRS
On 05/10/2018 10:12 AM,
ea5gvk@... wrote:
How can I bridge a TG xxx DMR from Brandmeister to a Reflector XLX xxx Room X DMR?
please.
Would there be any way to incorporate this possibility in the MMDVM_Bridge?
Thank you.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Ok, but for connect a XLX, need Initial Room Select? How do it?
My first guess is you will need to add DMRGateway. MMDVM_Bridge will
connect to a server exactly like MMDVMHost, so if you can do it with
MMDVMHost, you can do it with MMDVM_Bridge.
Is there information on how to connect to a XLX room with DMRGateway available?
Steve N4IRS
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Is there information on how to connect to a XLX room with DMRGateway available?
Steve N4IRS
On 05/10/2018 10:28 AM,
ea5gvk@... wrote:
With MMDVM, I have to connect through DMRGateway.
But yes, MMDVM_Bridge available functions automatic select Inicital Room, it is fine.
EA5GVK Joaquin
Yes information it in https://github.com/g4klx/DMRGateway/blob/master/DMRGateway.ini
The idea is
MMDVM_Bridge (connect BM can Select TG for example 21461) <-> MMDVM_Bridge1 (connect XLX 051 Room G for example).
But for all it, any need add DMRGateway.
Need MMDVM_Bridge have available select TG de BM and available connect XLX to Room Specific.
The idea is
MMDVM_Bridge (connect BM can Select TG for example 21461) <-> MMDVM_Bridge1 (connect XLX 051 Room G for example).
But for all it, any need add DMRGateway.
Need MMDVM_Bridge have available select TG de BM and available connect XLX to Room Specific.
We can look at it but for now, use DMRGateway with MMDVM_Bridge.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 05/10/2018 10:38 AM,
ea5gvk@... wrote:
Yes information it in https://github.com/g4klx/DMRGateway/blob/master/DMRGateway.ini
The idea is
MMDVM_Bridge (connect BM can Select TG for example 21461) <-> MMDVM_Bridge1 (connect XLX 051 Room G for example).
But for all it, any need add DMRGateway.
Need MMDVM_Bridge have available select TG de BM and available connect XLX to Room Specific.
You can control the traffic from BM with the selfcare account for
that Repeater ID / Callsign.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 05/10/2018 10:43 AM,
ea5gvk@... wrote:
Ok, perfect, many thx.
I will do tests with DMRGateway to see if it works. And I inform him.
It would be a great advance that from MMDVM_Bridge we have the option of passing all the connection traffic bm or being able to select ONLY the Traffic of a TG in particular.
Ken,
I don't see why you could not run both on the same hosts. MMDVM_Bridge would allow you to change any of the port numbers to resolve any port conflicts.
Steve
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I don't see why you could not run both on the same hosts. MMDVM_Bridge would allow you to change any of the port numbers to resolve any port conflicts.
Steve
On 6/18/2018 8:08 AM, Ken Jamrogowicz
via Groups.Io wrote:
I would like to do this. Can the MMDVM_Bridge instances run on the same PC? as XLX or would something like port conflicts cause a problem?
Ken
KE2N
I was just looking at the question of running MMDVM_Bridge on the
same host as XLX. If I understand XLX properly, he would need 2
instances.
XLX <-> MMDVM_Bridge1 <-> MMDVM_Bridge2 <-> BM
Basically, use 2 instances of MMDVM_Bridge to both act as clients to their respective servers.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
XLX <-> MMDVM_Bridge1 <-> MMDVM_Bridge2 <-> BM
Basically, use 2 instances of MMDVM_Bridge to both act as clients to their respective servers.
On 6/18/2018 9:11 AM, KB8JNM wrote:
i would think you might be able to run a "new instance" with different ports.
Where would the conflict be. Or are you suggesting you would be able to do this under the 'same instance' ?
Lito - WI6Y
So two channels are required per transcoded module? Is there a way to maximize usage where if a transcoder is free, a module would be able to utilize it?
Get Outlook for iOS