New to this group - Interested in DMR to analog linking (via XLX)


Santu OTTAVI (TK1BI)
 



Le 09/05/2018 à 10:14, Santu OTTAVI (TK1BI) a écrit :
AlLStarLink <---> Analog_Bridge <--> HB_Bridge

In such a setup, can HB_Bridge connect to a XLX reflector instead of direct BM ?

If I understand well, a more accurate diagram would be :

AlLStarLink <---> Analog_Bridge <--> HB_Bridge <--> HBLink  <--> ??? XLX ???

So, my question becomes : "Can HBLink connect to a XLX reflector" ?


Steve N4IRS
 

Actually, my diagram is accurate. HB_Bridge is the program. Like all of the HBLink programs, HB_Bridge sub-classses hblink.py

73, Steve N4IRS

On 05/09/2018 04:55 AM, Santu OTTAVI (TK1BI) wrote:


Le 09/05/2018 à 10:14, Santu OTTAVI (TK1BI) a écrit :
AlLStarLink <---> Analog_Bridge <--> HB_Bridge

In such a setup, can HB_Bridge connect to a XLX reflector instead of direct BM ?

If I understand well, a more accurate diagram would be :

AlLStarLink <---> Analog_Bridge <--> HB_Bridge <--> HBLink  <--> ??? XLX ???

So, my question becomes : "Can HBLink connect to a XLX reflector" ?


Santu OTTAVI (TK1BI)
 

Le 09/05/2018 à 12:32, Steve N4IRS a écrit :
Actually, my diagram is accurate. HB_Bridge is the program. Like all of the HBLink programs, HB_Bridge sub-classses hblink.py
...and my question is accurate, too ;-) The main stack is in HBLink. If HBLink can talk to XLX, then HB_Bridge will talk, too.

And it seems the answer to that question is : NO.

I found a thread last october ("Current status DMRlink, HBlink DVSwitch") about a problem with XLX not returning the Repeater ID after the RPTACK. The recommended solution was to modify the XLX code so that it sends that Repeater ID. I don't know if this has been done or not.

Does anybody have news about this HBLink -> XLX problem ?

73 de TK1BI